During March, I wrote extensively about Catholic writer-lecturer Edwina Gateley who was apparently too controversial to be allowed to speak at the Franciscan Renewal Center in Paradise Valley without the Diocese of Phoenix monitoring her remarks. The center is a Catholic facility, and the bishop has a policy that Catholic critics not have the privilege to use church property for their forums.Gateley, 63, author of 10 books, had been engaged to speak to a retreat for nuns for a week in early June, but she balked when she was informed that Bishop Thomas Olmsted wanted to have her talks taped for review to ensure Catholic orthodoxy and congruity with church teachings. Gateley insisted that what she planned to say, especially about the feminist realm of the divine, met the test, but she said such tapings would violate copyright terms she has with the company that markets her lecture CDs. Catholic reform groups, most notably Call to Action and the Arizona Center for Theological Studies, came to her defense, and a Friends of Edwina Gateley group rallied to raise funds comparable to the $4,000 she would have gotten for the retreat. Then they booked her to speak to the public on June 10 at CrossRoads United Methodist Church in Phoenix.Catholic Women Will Not Be Silenced read a 6 by 5 -inch advertisement published June 8 in the Arizona Republic. The retreat facilitator, Catholic author Edwina Gateley courageously refused the bishops threats, the ad said. The retreat was canceled but the talk will go on. It invited people to hear her at the Methodist church. We support Edwina and the voices of Catholic women everywhere.The text was surrounded by some of the 2,000 names of people who Call to Action said signed a petition protesting the dioceses action. The petition was turned in that day to the bishop. We Catholics in Phoenix are deeply disappointed that the bishop would resort to the use of threats to tape and monitor a retreat for nuns, said Mary Jayne Benton, a leader for Arizonas Call to Action, in a press release that day. The statement went further: The nuns retreat was originally promoted as a weeks reflection on the feminine dimensions of God. The tradition of imaging God in female form has a rich history dating back to the Hebrew scriptures (Old Testament) and carrying through the Christian scriptures and much of Christian history.Benton reports that about 300 turned out for Gateleys talk that lasted 90 minutes. She knew of no representatives from the bishops office on hand taping or taking notes. Meanwhile, the original retreat was not canceled. The Franciscan Renewal Center subsequently booked Sister Mary Lou Carlson, a Franciscan nun from Resurrection parish in Los Angeles, to lead the retreat, said Pat Julian, the centers director of adult education. There were about 30 nuns attending, the same count as had originally signed up for Gateley. Meanwhile, Jim Dwyer, public information director for the diocese, reasserted Tuesday that we didnt silence her. It was her (Gateleys) decision not to come there. Nobody silenced her. She came here, didnt she?At some point, the media has to start asking logical questions about advocacy groups, Dwyer continued. They are entitled to say whatever they want to say, but truth is: Nobody silenced her. Dwyer said the diocese has heard that sometimes she makes statements that are opposed to Catholic teachings, but we didnt want to take anyone elses word for it. So she was welcomed to come. All we wanted to do was to tape it. Dwyer reiterated that the diocese had been willing to sign wavers to guarantee no violation of copyright provisions between Gateley and the company marketing her CDs. Dwyer said their taping would have cleared the way for Gateley to come in the future to the diocese to speak in Catholic settings. We could decide for ourselves if she comes here again, he said. She is the one who silenced herself from that retreat If they ever want to continue to make false claims that we silenced her, there is not a whole lot we can do about it.Benton said that Gateley was well-received at the CrossRoads gathering. Quite a number of women came up to her after her talk and said that after they heard her, they will be staying in the church. So there isnt a real dynamic push against the church She talks about faithfulness to what God is calling you to do.
Catholic diocese: Gateley not silencedJune 27th, 2007, 4:47 pm · 9 Comments · posted by lawngriffiths9 CommentsLeave a Reply |








So, we “silence” oursleves by speaking our truth. ? This Bishop likely would want to tape Jesus’ remarks if visiting the diocese as He clearly would be promoting ideas contrary to those of the Hierarchy, such as Inclusiveness.
How convinent of Edwina to hide behind her copyright terms in order to smear the reputation of the Church and Her faithful bishop. Major kudos to Bishop Olmstead for not allowing shoddy theology to creep into and corrupt his diocese without engagement. My heart and prayers go out to the good bishop - as well as any others here in the US - that have to play the role of “super nanny” to dissenting heretics (er, I mean, “cahtholics”) amidst their fold.
I can understand the comments from “voice of reason”(?) because it is clear that the writer is commenting from a fearful, defensive mode and probably did not hear Edwina in Phoenix. I would suggest that namecalling is not a behavior thatJjesus would have taught or endorsed. If we had more listening and dialogue, we might find that we are closer than we think, all one in the Lord.
I signed the petition. My parish pastor Fr. David Ostler of Our Lady of Lourdes, Sun City West, AZ has informed me I can no longer LEAD any minisrtry in HIS parish. The SILENCING GOES ON.
In my opinion, calling someone a heretic isn’t really a bad thing. To me it’s like telling someone they have something on their face. This gives them a chance to fix what they were doing wrong.
I agree with Jude. It is the responsibility of the Church’s hierarchy to see that the people of the Church are not scandalized. Allowing someone to come into a Catholic setting and potentially preach or teach heresy (defined as: the formal denial or doubt of any defined doctrine of the Church) would be inexcusable. I think the Diocese actions were completely right. And don’t think for a second that Protestant churches are any different. Just try teaching in a Southern Baptist church the doctrine of salvation as it is understood by Catholics (i.e. you can “lose” your salvation”). You wouldn’t get in the front door. But, the Free Will Baptists would probably give you a ride to their church. In any case, there’s nothing wrong with a church (or The Church in this case) making sure that any teaching that goes on is in line with its orthodoxy. It’s important. It matters. In fact, in the Catholic view, your SOUL is on the line.
Kudos to Bishop Olmstead and to Fr. David Ostler.
By the way, look up the Catholic understanding of “scandal” before pouncing on my opening statement.
The abuses continue as long as the bishops, clergy, and blind catholics deny there are systemic problems of power abuse! And these abuses are deeply seated in the social, spiritual, and psychological makeup of catholics. I feel very unfortunate to belong to a church that does not accept married clergy of both biological exitences. And to think how sick this deniel is. How much more abuse will we suffer. I would like to record the bishops conversations with his advisors as the grass roots rise up.
Silly man…what would be so wrong with taping Jesus’ remarks…isn’t that what the four gospels did?
And btw, Edwina Gateley and Call to Action is not Jesus. Call to Action is a dissident group of men and women who call themselves Catholic but act like protestants.
I am grateful we have Bishop Olmsted leading the faithful Catholics of Phoenix to holiness.
Joe Santa, what pray tell, does a married clergy have to do with abuse???
Can’t wait to hear this one…